Analysis, Commentary & Analysis, Diplomacy & Negotiations, Minsk Negotiations

The Negotiations in Moscow

Original: Colonel Cassad
Translated by Alexander Fedotov / Edited by @GBabeuf

^B35617ABC4433D484D2C780A9574AB899195E0097ADA20935F^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr

Talks in Moscow between Putin, Hollande and Merkel continue.

By evening some details and background of these negotiations became public; some evaluate them as a final attempt to avoid further escalation in Ukraine.

  1. As gazeta.ru has stated, the Americans have no relation to Merkel’s and Hollande’s proposals and are simply observing. Actually, this fact already indicates that achieving stabilisation in Ukraine without US participation will be difficult or even impossible. The USA also still continues to insist on the Minsk format and yet maintain their main threat at this stageto start delivery of lethal weapons to the fascist junta In this regard, European attempts to avoid a major war are understandable, but they run into the same problems as the Kremlin’s attempts to freeze the conflictthe initiator and main beneficiary of the conflict is not participating in the negotiations, which, a priori, reduces their worth.

  1. According to unconfirmed reports, among the issues discussed is a review of the demarcation line between the parties that is already quite different from the line that was agreed in the secret protocols to the Minsk Agreement. The Kremlin naturally suggests considering not the old line (which Kiev breached by seizing Donetsk Airport), but the current one, where the Debaltsevo protrusion has become the Debaltsevo “intestine.” In this respect, adopting the Kremlin’s proposals would be a de facto recognition that full implementation of the Minsk Agreement is no longer possible and that they must be amended. In fact, such assumptions are based on the idea that Merkel and Hollande anyway offered to adjust the Minsk format since neither Kiev nor Donetsk, nor Moscow are going to implement it in its original form.

  1. On the eve of the start of the negotiations, Merkel and other German dignitaries were very sceptical about the possibility of any progress in negotiations on Ukraine.

    “We do not know whether these talks will be long or short or whether they will be the last. We are only doing what we can to resolve the conflict and stop the bloodshed,” said Merkel.

    The representative of the German Chancellor, Stefan Siebert, was even more sceptical: “There is no indication that there will be a breakthrough.”

    Nevertheless, the long-term nature of the talks in the Kremlin, where now the issues of war and peace are being solved, indicates that the parties will try to find common ground up to the very end and, if not to end the conflict, then somehow to slow down its development. It is already quite clear that if agreements on Ukraine are not reached, Europe will impose new sanctions against the Russian Federation in February.

  2. In the area of Debaltsevo where the local truce for evacuating civilians was timed, so to speak, to negotiations, it was de facto thwarted. The population in Debaltsevo was very badly informed about the safe corridor; the Junta’s troops also opened fire during the “truce”, showing once again how easily the Junta breaks any agreement, even minor.

Overall, we await the outcome closer to nightfall and will thereby see in which direction the Ukrainian Civil War will be steered.

Advertisements

Discussion

5 thoughts on “The Negotiations in Moscow

  1. All that is encompassed by the phrase “Empire of Chaos” makes me ill and despairing for the future of humanity.

    Good report from Col Cassad. In the absence of any reason for optimism, it seems best to learn what reality is, as against the delusions of the Empire/Washington and the Kiev Junta.

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by gerryhiles | February 9, 2015, 02:03
  2. Reblogged this on EU: Ramshackle Empire and commented:
    This is Part 2 of the posts on the discussions in Moscow. They got nowhere, but are planning to meet again. It is clear that as long as US is so militant no long-term peace will be possible. Originally, Ukraine was EU´s expansion, but the USA has worked towards making it their interest to aggressively recruit Ukraine. The timing of the announcement of Obama (presented by Kerry) was to arm Ukraine with “defensive (?) weapons”.

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by jimsresearchnotes | February 9, 2015, 06:28
  3. on the kremlin talks, i notice how merkel showed very tense and nervous, today speaking among homosexual obama, i saw here shamed… no way to turn out.
    is ugly to see how big preasure is being put to her, she so tense and ashamed, even afraid as hollande must to be.
    she is not being her, she’s not allowed.
    good intelligence by cassad

    Like

    Posted by gab | February 10, 2015, 08:27

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: The Negotiations in Moscow | Piotr Bein's blog = blog Piotra Beina - February 9, 2015

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Latest map of hostilities (25/01)

Our Partners:

southfront.org
VoxPopuliEvo

Archived Briefings

A Record of Our Times

February 2015
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
Follow SLAVYANGRAD.org on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 38,130 other followers

Latest Briefings

Blog Stats

  • 1,628,509 hits
%d bloggers like this: